In air traffic control (ATC), instrument errors refer to inaccuracies or malfunctions in the equipment used to monitor and control aircraft. These errors can range from a simple misreading of instrument displays to more complex system failures that can impact the safe operation of aircraft.
Factors Responsible For Instrument Errors
Instrument errors can be caused by a variety of factors, including equipment malfunctions, operator errors, maintenance issues, and environmental factors such as electromagnetic interference. To minimize the risk of instrument errors, air traffic control services typically implement a robust set of procedures and protocols to ensure the accuracy and reliability of their equipment.
Some common types of instrument errors that can occur in air traffic control include:
This occurs when an aircraft’s altitude deviates from its assigned flight level due to an incorrect reading on the aircraft’s altimeter.
This occurs when an air traffic controller misjudges the position or altitude of an aircraft based on an incorrect reading of their instruments.
This occurs when a piece of air traffic control equipment malfunctions or fails, leading to incorrect readings or system failures.
Data Entry Errors
This occurs when air traffic controllers input incorrect data into their systems, leading to incorrect readings or system failures.
To minimize the risk of instrument errors in air traffic control, air traffic services typically implement a robust set of procedures and protocols, including regular equipment maintenance, operator training, and the use of multiple sources of information to cross-check instrument readings. For example, air traffic controllers may use radar, communication systems, and other sources of information to cross-check the accuracy of instrument readings and reduce the risk of instrument errors.
Instrument Error and Midair Collision
Instrument errors can lead to mid-air collisions between aircraft. For example, if an aircraft's altitude deviates from its assigned flight level due to an incorrect reading on the aircraft's altimeter, it can result in a mid-air collision if that aircraft comes too close to another aircraft. Similarly, spatial disorientation caused by incorrect instrument readings can result in air traffic controllers making incorrect decisions that lead to a midair collision.
It's important to note that midair collisions are rare in the aviation industry, due to the robust procedures and protocols in place to minimize the risk of instrument errors and other factors that can contribute to collisions. However, even a single midair collision can have devastating consequences, so air traffic control services and aircraft operators must remain vigilant in their efforts to maintain the safety and efficiency of air traffic operations.
Reported Aircraft Incidents caused by Instrument Errors
There have been several reported aircraft incidents that were caused by instrument errors. Some examples include
TWA Flight 800
This 1996 incident was caused by an electrical short circuit that resulted in a fuel tank explosion, killing all 230 people on board. The investigation found that the short circuit was likely caused by a problem with the aircraft's fuel gauge instrumentation.
Air France Flight 447
This 2009 incident was caused by incorrect airspeed readings due to icing on the aircraft's pitot tubes, which resulted in the plane crashing into the Atlantic Ocean, killing all 228 people on board.
Asiana Airlines Flight 214
This 2013 incident was caused by incorrect airspeed readings due to misaligned sensors on the aircraft's wing, resulting in a crash landing at San Francisco International Airport.
Incidents Related to Instrument Errors in Air Traffic Control Services
There have been several reported incidents in air traffic control (ATC) services that were caused by instrument errors. Some examples include
JFK Airport, New York
In 2011, a failure of the airport's glide slope indicator resulted in several aircraft being diverted to other airports and causing significant disruptions to air traffic operations.
Dublin Airport, Ireland
In 2013, a failure of the airport's Instrument Landing System (ILS) resulted in several aircraft being diverted and causing significant disruptions to air traffic operations.
Heathrow Airport, London
In 2014, a power failure failed the airport's ILS, causing significant disruptions to air traffic operations and leading to several aircraft being diverted to other airports.
These incidents highlight the importance of accurate and reliable instrumentation in aircraft and Air Traffic Control Services, and the consequences that can result from instrument errors. Air traffic control services and aircraft operators must take steps to minimize the risk of instrument errors and ensure the safe and efficient operation of air traffic operations.
In conclusion, instrument errors in air traffic control can have serious impacts on the safe operation of aircraft, but by implementing robust procedures and protocols, air traffic services can minimize the risk of these errors and ensure the safety and efficiency of air traffic control operations.
Steps to be followed by ATSEP in Rectification of Instrument Error
Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel (ATSEP) play a critical role in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of instrumentation in air traffic control services. In the event of an instrument error, ATSEP must take the following steps to rectify the issue
Isolate the problem
The first step in rectifying an instrument error is to identify and isolate the problem. This may involve using diagnostic tools and procedures to determine the source of the error and the extent of its impact on air traffic operations.
Conduct a safety assessment
Once the problem has been identified and isolated, ATSEP must conduct a safety assessment to determine the potential impact of the instrument error on air traffic operations. This may include an analysis of the current weather conditions, aircraft traffic density, and other factors that may affect the risk of incidents or accidents.
Implement corrective action
Based on the results of the safety assessment, ATSEP must implement corrective action to rectify the instrument error. This may involve repairing or replacing faulty equipment, modifying operating procedures, or taking other steps to ensure the safe and efficient operation of air traffic operations.
Monitor the situation
Once corrective action has been taken, ATSEP must monitor the situation to ensure that the instrument error has been fully rectified and that air traffic operations are proceeding safely and efficiently. This may involve conducting further safety assessments and making additional adjustments as necessary to maintain the accuracy and reliability of the instrumentation.
By taking these steps, ATSEP can help to ensure the safe and efficient operation of air traffic control services, even in the event of instrument errors or other technical issues. Regular training and maintenance of equipment can help to minimize the risk of instrument errors and ensure the continued safety of air traffic operations.
Steps to be followed by ATSEP for Preventing Instrument Error
ATSEP (Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel) can take the following preventive measures to minimize instrument errors
Regular maintenance and calibration of instruments to ensure accurate readings.
Adherence to standard operating procedures to minimize human error.
Implementation of redundancy measures, such as dual systems, to provide backup in case of system failure.
Regular training for ATSEP personnel to stay updated with the latest technology and procedures.
Implementation of quality control measures to ensure the accuracy of data and systems.
Timely reporting and investigation of any incidents to identify and address root causes.
Use of advanced technology such as data validation and reconciliation algorithms to detect and prevent errors.
Collaboration with other departments and organizations to ensure a seamless and error-free operation.
SkyRadar's System Monitoring & Control Solution
SkyRadar is continuously embracing new trends in its system monitoring & control solution. The Use-cases on errors and system malfunctions, described in this series are or will be implemented in SkyRadar's SkySMC training system. Implementations are consisting of
- real hardware like training radars, transmitters, receivers, UPSs, networks,
- virtualized hardware like virtual servers, networks, applications
- simulated solutions like various tower and radar designs
- or a mixture of all three
SkySMC - SkyRadar’s System Monitoring and Control Suite is a pedagogically enhanced, fully operational monitoring & control tool. We have optimized it to cater for the ATSEP-SMC training compliant to EASA's Easy Access Rules for ATM-ANS (Regulation (EU) 2017/373) and ICAO Doc 10057.
SkyRadar provides SkySMC as a complete laboratory in a turn-key approach, or as a service.
SkySMC is not a simulator, but a fully operational open monitoring system. It comes by default with a server including various virtualized applications and virtualized servers, but also connects to simulated systems. In addition, there are various hardware extensions available including training infrastructures, monitorable training radars, or even complete ATM systems, all connected to the System Monitoring & Control solution.
SkyRadar's System Monitoring & Control training system can be easily blended into distance learning solutions.
Stay tuned to be always the first to learn about new use cases and training solutions in radar qualification (real radars or simulators) for ATSEP.
Or simply talk to us to discuss your training solution.